As we survey the threat landscape, two things are certain—targeted attacks and advanced persistent threats (APTs) are here to stay, and organizations face increased risk from advanced attacks compared to the past two years. Several existing trends will continue, and we’re seeing attackers refine their tools in ways that will drive new trends in the coming months.
Digitization and digital transformation in healthcare are delivering amazing advances in everything from diagnostic imaging and patient monitoring to medication safety, insurance claims processing, medical devices, and genetic research. As healthcare organizations reap significant benefits from innovation, they also must protect themselves and their patients from cyber attackers who develop increasingly sophisticated attack tools and methodologies.
What do enterprise security teams have in common with Hannibal at the Battle of Cannae in 216 B.C.? A lot. Both face an onslaught of adversaries. Both have valuable reputations and territory (or markets) at stake. And both need a way to outdistance enemies by enlisting new tactics. With today’s cyberattacks, yesterday’s approaches are not enough. As it did for Hannibal, deception offers a way to turn attackers’ own methods against them. The history of deception shows that weapons and tactics might change, but the ability to make an adversary act on something that isn’t real offers modern enterprise defenders a new arsenal of tools.
As 2017 comes to a close, the string of recent attacks on SWIFT and other financial messaging systems are emerging as one of the main threat trends. News has just surfaced of another such attack – this time impacting Globex Bank in Russia, which took place on December 15th. Attackers apparently attempted to steal almost $1M by manipulating international transfer requests through the systems within the bank that connect to the SWIFT messaging service.
People usually associate “advanced persistent threat” (APT) with malicious outsiders—nation-state or other sophisticated attackers. Generally, once an APT attacker has established an initial foothold, they conduct “low-and-slow”-style attacks involving a prolonged period of reconnaissance and lateral movement. Insider threats are usually thought of as intentional (or sometimes accidental) acts of data theft or other compromise committed by trusted users who know their way around and have legitimate, open access to sensitive assets.
The threat news of the week is about MoneyTaker – a cybercrime group apparently responsible for theft of over $10M from 18 banks in the US and Russia. If you’ve read any of the online accounts, it’s easy to be overwhelmed by the details and the growing sophistication of cybercrime groups. While it’s important not to downplay their fierceness and the growing risks associated with advanced persistent threats, it’s also important to focus on the relatively simple capability organizations can embrace to combat them.